The Science of Balance – Chpt.2 Society

Chaos is what you get when you remove balance from society. Contrary to popular belief humans do not see in black and white. It is possible to be against brainwash, cult following, secret society’s and closed mindedness while being pro religion. I can be against abortion while being pro choice. I may be anti government while seeing benefit in protection, infrastructure and education. These things, while they may seem contradictory are not.

I will now take a moment to explain something called “Falun Gong”.To this day in China there is a persecution of a group of people who practice this Falun Gong. It is the practice of balance through meditation. While the man is Ying (left) the woman is believed to be Yang (yang). Removing what religious parts may be seen in any following, you can observe the promotion: calmness, health through stretching and circulation, and balance and alignment of body and “energy”.

Now think for a moment what this could mean for a relationship that aligns itself with a man’s ying and a woman’s yang. You remove the concept of arguments. No longer does a man or woman need to be correct and win the conflict, now they can accept their differences. A key contribution to relationships failing is the inability to understand that opposites attract and the differences are what make each person in the relationship unique. Instead of working to become singularity, the couple can learn to accept one another and leave back judgement and argument.

This is the same with our politics, religions and Governments. By dividing people into only two parties with strict philosophies, you can’t expect to fit into any particular group. Because humans are built to be balanced, diverse and always changing we will change our opinions and belief systems and we move through time. If society was setup to reflect our diversity we would have peace and harmony in most areas. I am not proposing a solution, just a philosophy that can be applied for better balance.

I want to turn your attention briefly to what structure we do have today. It is called

Hegelian dialectic

n

(Philosophy)philosophy an interpretive method in which the contradiction between a proposition (thesis) and itsantithesis is resolved at a higher level of truth (synthesis)

This is a manipulative method which subscribes to harmony. I call it manipulative because it proposes the chaos and disorder against a society’s will. It is controlled from the top and conducted in the shadow through wars, discord and turmoil to get a society or people to become tired of the conflict and accept a resolution of peace which may or may not benefit them. None the less, the fact that it exist must bring some validation to the concept that balance is in its own right a science.